Abstract
In the US rice market, California recorded the highest price at US$33.4/cwt, according to 2023 data. As has been the trend up until now, although California produces less rice than other states, prices are high due to high quality and rising production costs. California’s climate is particularly suited to growing high-quality Japonica rice, which is highly valued by consumers and the market. On the other hand, the price of rice is heavily influenced by the balance between supply and demand. California’s high prices may also be due to external factors, such as local water shortages and rising labor costs. Compared to other rice-producing states, for example Mississippi and Arkansas, prices are relatively stable due to their vast land area and low production costs. This results in a difference in price across the board. Overall, California’s higher prices reflect higher-quality rice production, while regional price differences indicate market dynamics.
Rice production Annual crop measured in cwt
Looking at price trends in the US rice market, data from 1904 to 2023 provides a good picture of price fluctuations and the underlying reasons. Of particular note is the high price recorded in California in 2022 of US$41/cwt. The price is considered one of historic peaks and reflects the high quality of California rice and increasing production costs. California has ideal climate conditions for rice cultivation and is known for producing high-quality Japonica rice. However, in the few years since this price peak, current prices have fallen to 81.5% of the peak. This is influenced by a variety of factors. For example, changing global economic conditions, increasing competition from imports, as well as local water issues and rising labour costs are all affecting prices. Additionally, relatively low production costs in other rice-producing states ensure price stability. Over the long term, the U.S. rice market has fluctuated depending on supply and demand, weather conditions, and international markets. Price trends in California reflect the balance between quality and production costs, and these factors are likely to continue to have a significant impact on prices.


The maximum is 41usd / cwt[2022] of CALIFORNIA, and the current value is about 81.5%
Rice production measured in cwt annual crop (50 US states)
Looking at price trends in the U.S. rice market using data from 1949 to 2023, price fluctuations in California are particularly notable. The 2022 record price of $41/cwt in California was the highest price recorded in historical data. The high prices reflect the high quality of California rice and growing demand. Another factor is the rising cost of rice production. However, by 2023, prices had fallen 81.5% from this peak. This decline is due to multiple factors. First, there is global economic instability, a domestic oversupply in the United States, and cheap rice supplies from other producing states. Factors specific to California include water scarcity due to climate change and rising labor costs. Since 1949, rice prices have fluctuated depending on many factors, including the balance between supply and demand, weather conditions, and trends in the international market. Price trends in California reflect better quality and fluctuating production costs, and these factors are likely to continue to have a significant impact on prices.


The maximum is 41usd / cwt[2022] of CALIFORNIA, and the current value is about 81.5%
Rice production measured in cwt annual crops (latest year, 50 US states)
Price data for the US rice market in 2023 shows regional price differences and the reasons behind them. California’s price was the highest overall at $33.4/cwt. This is due to California being a producer of high-quality rice, as well as water resource constraints and high labor costs. These high prices reflect the quality of rice provided by California growers and the unique production costs of the region. Meanwhile, the national average price of rice was $19.1/cwt, which is significantly lower than California prices but remains stable overall. With the overall combined price of US$115/cwt, the rice market has a range of prices and overall pricing is dependent on the market supply and demand balance, transportation costs and international prices. Looking at price trends to date, while prices in California remain relatively high, the market remains stable overall. Fluctuations in the national average price are due to the demand and supply of rice, weather conditions and international market trends. California’s status as a producer of high-quality rice and national price dynamics will influence future market trends.


The maximum is 33.4usd / cwt of CALIFORNIA, the average is 19.1usd / cwt, and the total is 115usd / cwt
Main data
RICE(ALL CLASSES, ALL PRODUCTION PRACTICES, ALL UTILIZATION PRACTICES, PRICE RECEIVED, UNITED STATES) [usd / cwt] | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALIFORNIA | US TOTAL | TEXAS | LOUISIANA | MISSISSIPPI | ARKANSAS | MISSOURI | OTHER STATES | |
2023 | 33.4 | 19.5 | 17.6 | 16.5 | 15.9 | 15.7 | 15.4 | |
2022 | 41 | 19.8 | 17.4 | 17 | 16.9 | 16.5 | 16.6 | |
2021 | 32 | 15 | 14.2 | 13.7 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 13.6 | |
2020 | 22.8 | 14.4 | 13.3 | 12.6 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.1 | |
2019 | 21.8 | 13.6 | 12.8 | 11.8 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 12.1 | |
2018 | 21.3 | 13.1 | 12.5 | 11.2 | 10.8 | 10.7 | 10.7 | |
2017 | 20.3 | 11.2 | 11.9 | 11.7 | 11.5 | 11.1 | 12 | |
2016 | 14.3 | 11.5 | 10.4 | 10.2 | 9.55 | 9.39 | 9.92 | |
2015 | 18.4 | 12.5 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 11 | 10.9 | 11.2 | |
2014 | 21.8 | 15.6 | 13.8 | 12.9 | 12.2 | 12 | 11 | |
2013 | 20.9 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 15.5 | 15.4 | 15.2 | 15.1 | |
2012 | 18.6 | 14.5 | 15.2 | 14.4 | 14.6 | 14.3 | 14.1 | |
2011 | 18.6 | 13.7 | 14 | 13.4 | 13.3 | 13.4 | 13.5 | |
2010 | 21 | 12.7 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 11.3 | 11 | |
2009 | 19.6 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 13 | 12.9 | 13.4 | 12.9 | |
2008 | 27.5 | 16.2 | 15.7 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 15 | 13.8 | |
2007 | 16.2 | 10.5 | 12.4 | 12.7 | 12.6 | 12.1 | 11.9 | |
2006 | 13 | 9.96 | 10 | 9.83 | 9.38 | 9.43 | 9.38 | |
2005 | 10.1 | 7.04 | 7.77 | 7.47 | 7.36 | 7.27 | 6.87 | |
2004 | 7.34 | 8.43 | 7.96 | 7.77 | 7.48 | 7.13 | 6.98 | |
2003 | 10.4 | 8.08 | 7.35 | 7.68 | 7.34 | 7.7 | 7.2 | |
2002 | 6.32 | 4.49 | 4.16 | 4.14 | 4.94 | 4.16 | 3.9 | |
2001 | 5.28 | 4.25 | 4.61 | 4.47 | 4.15 | 3.93 | 3.7 | |
2000 | 4.99 | 5.69 | 5.82 | 5.82 | 5.68 | 5.6 | 5.4 | |
1999 | 6.97 | 7.6 | 6.04 | 5.99 | 5.49 | 5.71 | 5.6 | |
1998 | 9.19 | 8.89 | 9.32 | 8.87 | 8.99 | 8.87 | 8.75 | |
1997 | 7.95 | 10.01 | 10.9 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 9.87 | 10 | |
1996 | 7.91 | 9.96 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 10.3 | |
1995 | 8.79 | 9.15 | 9.73 | 9.09 | 9.25 | 9.14 | 9.06 | |
1994 | 6.97 | 6.78 | 7.12 | 6.71 | 7 | 6.52 | 6.72 | |
1993 | 8.27 | 7.98 | 7.6 | 7.65 | 8.37 | 7.97 | 8.03 | |
1992 | 5.64 | 5.89 | 6.17 | 5.88 | 5.82 | 5.93 | 5.91 | |
1991 | 6.65 | 7.58 | 8.15 | 7.67 | 8.48 | 7.69 | 7.81 | |
1990 | 5.93 | 6.7 | 7.41 | 6.73 | 6.99 | 6.75 | 7.21 | |
1989 | 6.27 | 7.35 | 8.02 | 7.81 | 7.57 | 7.46 | 7.54 | |
1988 | 6.15 | 6.83 | 7.24 | 6.9 | 7.02 | 6.9 | 7.22 | |
1987 | 6.72 | 7.27 | 8.07 | 7.65 | 7.9 | 7.6 | 7.41 | |
1986 | 3.18 | 3.75 | 4.22 | 4.03 | 3.91 | 3.68 | 3.57 | |
1985 | 5.33 | 6.53 | 7.38 | 7.24 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 7.05 | |
1984 | 6.43 | 8.04 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.88 | 8.51 | 8.7 | |
1983 | 6.96 | 8.57 | 9.97 | 8.9 | 9.53 | 9.18 | 9.49 | |
1982 | 6.65 | 7.91 | 8.94 | 8.05 | 8.66 | 8.61 | 8.65 | |
1981 | 7.35 | 9.05 | 10.4 | 9.36 | 9.14 | 9.37 | 9.5 | |
1980 | 14.1 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 12 | 12.7 | 12.3 | 12.3 | |
1979 | 9.55 | 10.5 | 11.6 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 10.7 | |
1978 | 7.06 | 8.16 | 9.27 | 7.5 | 7.98 | 8.47 | 8.75 | |
1977 | 9.15 | 9.49 | 9.55 | 8.94 | 10.2 | 9.79 | 9.7 | |
1976 | 6.91 | 7.02 | 7.21 | 6.53 | 6.79 | 7.25 | 7.49 | |
1975 | 7.65 | 8.35 | 8.81 | 8.38 | 8.42 | 8.54 | 8.53 | |
1974 | 11.7 | 11.2 | 10.9 | 11 | 10.2 | 11.4 | 11.9 | |
1973 | 11.1 | 13.8 | 14.8 | 13.45 | 17.2 | 15.3 | 15.5 | |
1972 | 6.83 | 6.73 | 6.44 | 6.4 | 7 | 7.2 | 7.1 | |
1971 | 5.24 | 5.34 | 5.35 | 5.05 | 5.63 | 5.62 | 5.4 | |
1970 | 5.02 | 5.17 | 5.25 | 4.96 | 5.28 | 5.41 | 5.4 | |
1969 | 4.8 | 4.95 | 4.88 | 4.71 | 5.27 | 5.32 | 5.3 | |
1968 | 5.15 | 5 | 4.97 | 4.83 | 5.2 | 5.07 | 5.08 | |
1967 | 4.84 | 4.97 | 4.94 | 4.91 | 5.34 | 5.12 | 5.09 | |
1966 | 4.75 | 4.95 | 5.13 | 4.81 | 5.1 | 5.09 | 5 | |
1965 | 4.88 | 4.93 | 5.04 | 4.79 | 5.06 | 4.98 | 4.98 | |
1964 | 4.92 | 4.9 | 4.94 | 4.84 | 5.2 | 4.87 | 5.08 | |
1963 | 5.07 | 5.01 | 5.09 | 4.95 | 5.24 | 4.92 | 4.9 | |
1962 | 5.11 | 5.04 | 5.03 | 4.88 | 5.25 | 5.1 | 4.87 | |
1961 | 4.78 | 5.14 | 5.31 | 5.28 | 5.38 | 5.2 | 5.02 | |
1960 | 4.43 | 4.55 | 4.85 | 4.5 | 4.88 | 4.41 | 4.39 | |
1959 | 4.19 | 4.59 | 4.94 | 4.63 | 4.71 | 4.6 | 4.53 | |
1958 | 3.81 | 4.68 | 5 | 4.96 | 4.9 | 4.94 | 4.53 | |
1957 | 4.48 | 5.11 | 5.45 | 5.28 | 5.31 | 5.16 | 4.75 | |
1956 | 4.44 | 4.86 | 5.26 | 4.8 | 5.02 | 4.93 | 4.6 | |
1955 | 4.31 | 4.81 | 5.13 | 4.66 | 5.03 | 5 | 4.5 | |
1954 | 4.61 | 4.57 | 5.14 | 4.26 | 4.5 | 4.25 | 4.25 | |
1953 | 5.38 | 5.19 | 5.4 | 5.01 | 4.9 | 4.93 | 4.9 | |
1952 | 6.25 | 5.87 | 5.88 | 5.53 | 5.9 | 5.82 | 5.8 | |
1951 | 4.95 | 4.82 | 4.86 | 4.55 | 4.8 | 4.98 | 4.9 | |
1950 | 4.54 | 5.09 | 5.46 | 5.07 | 5.2 | 5.13 | 5.1 | |
1949 | 3.42 | 4.1 | 4.51 | 4.37 | 4 | 4.07 | 4 | |
1948 | 4.88 | |||||||
1947 | 5.97 | |||||||
1946 | 5 | |||||||
1945 | 3.98 | |||||||
1944 | 3.93 | |||||||
1943 | 3.96 | |||||||
1942 | 3.61 | |||||||
1941 | 3.01 | |||||||
1940 | 1.8 | |||||||
1939 | 1.62 | |||||||
1938 | 1.42 | |||||||
1937 | 1.46 | |||||||
1936 | 1.85 | |||||||
1935 | 1.6 | |||||||
1934 | 1.75 | |||||||
1933 | 1.73 | |||||||
1932 | 0.93 | |||||||
1931 | 1.08 | |||||||
1930 | 1.74 | |||||||
1929 | 2.22 | |||||||
1928 | 2.02 | |||||||
1927 | 2.02 | |||||||
1926 | 2.51 | |||||||
1925 | 3.3 | |||||||
1924 | 2.99 | |||||||
1923 | 2.49 | |||||||
1922 | 2.19 | |||||||
1921 | 2.18 | |||||||
1920 | 2.48 | |||||||
1919 | 5.45 | |||||||
1918 | 3.99 | |||||||
1917 | 4.27 | |||||||
1916 | 2.19 | |||||||
1915 | 1.86 | |||||||
1914 | 1.98 | |||||||
1913 | 1.98 | |||||||
1912 | 1.98 | |||||||
1911 | 1.75 | |||||||
1910 | 1.47 | |||||||
1909 | 1.76 | |||||||
1908 | 1.8 | |||||||
1907 | 1.91 | |||||||
1906 | 2.01 | |||||||
1905 | 2.1 | |||||||
1904 | 1.46 |
Comments